A final rule amending the FAR to delete the the Executive Order Nondisplacement rules effective June 5, 2020 was finally issued ending the requirement to offer a first right of refusal for employment on government service contracts to certain workers.
Read MoreThe blizzard of COVID-19 related contracting activity poses considerable compliance risks. But, federal contractors shouldn’t be discouraged to be a part of our shared national mission to cope with this pandemic—just hurry up and wait long enough to consider how you’re responding under the circumstances. By doing so, hopefully you can avoid the painful question “what were they thinking?”
Read MoreHere is how we became government contracts lawyers. We both found a place sheltered from the storm, albeit 37 years apart, in the two greatest moments of economic distress since World War II.
Read MoreOFCCP issued an exemption for certain new coronavirus related contracts providing “relief” from certain parts of Executive Order 11246 (EO 11246), as amended, Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act (Section 503), as amended, and Section 4212 of the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRAA), as amended. Generally, contractors performing under a covered contract no longer have to abide by the sections that require affirmative action to ensure the hiring of employees without regard to their sex, sexual orientation, religion, color, race, disability status, or veteran status. However, this waiver only applies to the exempted contracts.
Read MoreThe COVID-19 pandemic has thrown virtually every routine out the window as the nation struggles to cope with a crisis that defies description. The routines of government contracting likewise are in a state of suspension where agencies and their contractors are struggling to find a new normal. Indeed, every day sees new guidance and directives regarding how to manage in the COVID-19 environment. On Monday (March 30), the Department of Defense released a memo that urges a reasoned approach to addressing these disruptions by making it clear that Contracting Officers are trusted and empowered to make contract adjustments to address these disruptions.
Read More
A dispute over the obligation to deliver replacement batteries for golf carts illustrates how years of contract performance can create confusion (and discord) over what happens at the end of a contract.
Read More
In tennis, foot faults are minor, yet sometimes game changing, errors. Three recent bid protest decisions demonstrate how seemingly technical glitches in the presentation of key personnel qualifications created potentially insurmountable errors.
Read MoreThe GAO recently found that a contract modification was so far outside the scope of a contract that it should have been the subject of a new procurement. Read on to learn what happened and what to consider when a contract is significantly modified such that it almost seems like a whole new beast.
Read MoreYou just won a contract. You brought that brilliant project manager on board. Then, your competitor files a protest and you have to stop work. What do you do to keep that manager in the stable? A recent case at the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denied a contractor the cost of doing something quite reasonable—keeping the manager on board.
Read MoreDOJ has issued guidance about how trade secrets and commercial or financial information should be treated under new Supreme Court precedent interpreting the Freedom of Information Act. This guidance hopefully will achieve the Court’s “fair reading” of the term “confidential” when it comes to determining whether information should be exempt from FOIA disclosures.
Read MoreUnder the Service Contract Act (“SCA”), employers with self-insured unfunded health and weflare (“H&W”) plans are better off forming a trust and paying acturial premiums into the trust monthly so they can get proper credit for the fringe benefits furnished.
Read MoreThe Court of Federal Claims decsion in Just In Time Staffing maintains the long-established practice of limiting the FAR price adjustment clause to its plain language – covering the increased costs of wages and fringe benefits of the contractor’s employees and certain enumerated payroll taxes — and not to the cost to negotiate a CBA.
Read MoreTeaming arrangements provide great opportunities to corral the expertise and experience of two or more organizations to pursue federal contracts. A recent case illustrates how technicalities can hinder an otherwise qualified team.
Read MoreFederal contractors frequently face the release of their confidential information as a result of requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). On the surface, FOIA exemption 4 should protect such information from disclosure. However, long-standing precedent required contractors to establish they would suffer substantial competitive harm if their information was released. The Supreme Court today handed down a game-changing decision that could greatly simplify contractors’ efforts to keep their sensitive information secure from disclosure.
Read MoreIn some disputes under the Service Contract Act (“SCA”), the contractor has to take his claims first to the US Department of Labor (“DOL”). In other circumstances, a final determination by the DOL is not required to bring a direct claim for reimbursement against the Government.
Read MoreWhen a covered service employee is given leave with or without pay for absences for sickness or injury, “there would not be a break in service” under the SCA rules, and the employee would be entitled to newly accrued but unused vacation benefits immediately upon his return to work.
Read MoreThe Government usually is a good customer that pays its bills, except when it doesn’t. Can a contractor pursue a claim for an unpaid invoice? It will depend on whether the government had a reasonable time to review and pay the invoice.
Read MoreWhile some specific additive payroll taxes are picked up and adjusted under the Service Contract Act Price Adjustment clause, the situation with state or local Gross Receipts Taxes (“GRT”), assessed as a percentage on government service contract revenue, is fraught with uncertainties. Contractors who failed to price these costs into their proposal up front have been left holding the bag.
Read MoreUnlike the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act, which covers most US Government construction projects, the Service Contract Act does not dictate the weekly payment of wages. So while Davis-Bacon Act covered construction workers' wages must be paid weekly, other federal laws like the SCA do not necessarily require such frequency of payment.
Read MoreAfter final arbitral award, a cost reimbursement contractor should have an opportunity to argue at the Board for the recovery the overtime backpay and other costs from the Federal government. There is no U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) procedures it has to exhaust first.
Read More