Now You See It; Now You Don’t -- Service Contract Act Coverage of Indirect Employees

The Service Contract Act (“SCA”) covers all “service employees” working on or in connection with a government service contract. But that begs the issue of when a worker is directly working on a contract versus indirectly facilitating the performance of the work. As to where the coverage line is drawn, that depends on the contract terms and the employee’s job duties.

Read More
DOL Investigations: Check their Math!

Responding to Department of Labor investigations is not a simple exercise. While you are required to cooperate, provide documents and access to employees, you are not obligated to accept an investigator’s findings and you can question them. But, before you push back, be thoughtful. And,don’t forget to check the math.

Read More
What Me Worry -- New SCA H&W Rates Issued by AAM 230.

The U.S. Department of Labor issued All Agency Memorandum (“AAM”) no. 230 posting new health and welfare (“H&W”) fringe benefit rates for Service Contract Act (“SCA”) covered contracts effective July 5, 2019. The new H&W rates are $4.54 an hour, except if there is a sick leave Executive Order clause in the contract, whereupon the H&W rates are set at $4.22 an hour.

Read More
Claims for CBA Negotiation Costs Are Not In Time and Not Subject to Any Price Adjustment In Fixed Priced Contracts

The Court of Federal Claims decsion in Just In Time Staffing maintains the long-established practice of limiting the FAR price adjustment clause to its plain language – covering the increased costs of wages and fringe benefits of the contractor’s employees and certain enumerated payroll taxes — and not to the cost to negotiate a CBA.

Read More
Is This the Beginning of a Fair Reading Era?

Last fall, the Supreme Court held in Encino Motorcars LLC v. Navarro that statutes should not be construed so as to achieve perceived legislative goals where there is no “textual reason” why they should be given anything other than a “fair reading.” My colleagues and I wondered whether the “fair reading” concept might show up again. Well, it did. Enter Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media.

Read More
FOIA Exemption 4: Protecting Proprietary Information (hopefully) Just Got Simpler

Federal contractors frequently face the release of their confidential information as a result of requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). On the surface, FOIA exemption 4 should protect such information from disclosure. However, long-standing precedent required contractors to establish they would suffer substantial competitive harm if their information was released. The Supreme Court today handed down a game-changing decision that could greatly simplify contractors’ efforts to keep their sensitive information secure from disclosure.

Read More